I've recently started a project, building a physics engine. I was hoping you could give me some advice related to some documentation and/or best technologies for this.
First of all, I've seen that Game-Physics-Engine-Development is highly recommended for the task at hand, and I was wondering if you could give me a second opinion.Should I get it? Also, while browsing Amazon, I've stumbled onto Game Engine Architecture and since I want to build my physics engine for games, I thought this might be a good read aswell.
Second, I know that simulating physics is highly computation intensive so I would like to use either CUDA or OpenCL.Right now I'm leaning towards OpenCL, because it would work on both NVIDIA and ATI chipsets.What do you guys suggest?
PS: I will be implementing this in C++ on Linux.
Here is how I learned to write a physics engine, its all free and highly recommendable:
Brian Vincent Mirtich's Thesis Impulse-based Dynamic Simulation of Rigid Body Systems
Kacic/Bullock "A practical dynamics system" SIGRAPH 2003, EDIT: Link added.
Those papers were mentioned in another great article from Nick Porcino (LucasArts) in one of the gems-books Gems 4 "Writing a Verlet-Based Physics Engine". Its not free, but its worth every penny.
Also have a look at other engines, here is the source for the Bullet Physics Engine.
About the CUDA/OpenCL implementation: make it run on the CPU first, it's complicated enough :)
Be aware that most likely you will throw your engine away after a while, since its just too hard to make a stable and well integrated physics engine with a competitive feature-list on your own, however it's a great learning experience!
As soon as you have a simple engine running, my advice is: make test-scenarios where you compare the result of your engine with the result of another engine. This helped me find a lot of errors and it will improve your interface; something like appling a similar force for 1 second at the same body in both engines.
Last but not least: Ignore collisions when you start, focus on a stable simulation first.
Maik is right, Baraff's papers are an excellent start, but don't forget Chris Heckers write-up on rigid body dynamics: http://chrishecker.com/Rigid_Body_Dynamics !
Also his advice on "[..] you will throw your engine away" is entirely true. But you will learn a lot!
Regarding the CUDA/OpenCL part of your question: If you know CUDA then switching to OpenCL becomes very easy. I'd recommend learning CUDA first, because there are so many good tutorials, example code and computation libraries out there. For example:
But be aware: Getting started on CUDA is easy, getting started on physics simulation is a good bit harder, but combining both is quite a challenge!
hey so I've decided to Code my own 2D soft-body physics engine in C++ since apparently none exist and I'm starting only with a general idea/understanding on how physics work and could be simulated... examples/sites that could give me the specifics needed to actually make this such as equations and required physics knowledge. It would be great if anyone out there also would give me their attempts or ideas. finally I was wondering if it was possible to... use the source code of an existing 3D engine such as Bullet and transform it to be 2D based? use the source code of a 2D Rigid body physics
I'm creating an FPS game. I'm writing my own game engine. So far all the backend stuff is going great. I'd like to support md2 as the native file format for 3D Objects, but I also want to use... For got to mention, the engine is based on OpenGL... Alright, for anyone who is reading this, I just found the Doom 3 md5 specifications (http://tfc.duke.free.fr/coding/md5-specs-en.html). It gives you some help on writing a parser (see bottom of link), but the example doesn't support lighting and texture mapping (the second set of example code allows for animation). Thanks @Neverender
with the Physics correctly... So my main question is: What would be a good combination of libraries to make an online game with? Im sure that many people have good combinations of libraries for making a game. The libraries that I would need are ones that fit the criteria of making a simple 3d game(online): 3D Graphics(including a model loader of some sort(if it works with blender that would be even...Lately I have been working on a game that i plan to make online. I have used different libraries to make this game as far as i could, but I feel that I should rethink on how Im sertting this game up
I have a very basic understanding of audio and was hoping I could get some help to resolve a problem with the audio design in my engine. Let me give you a run-down of how I've currently got... - framerates drop, and there is audio stuttering. I currently don't limit the number of concurrent sounds that can be played - can you give me any other advice on a better design, or solutions... a ResourceManager that can be used to load audio files into the required buffers ready for XAudio2 consumption. During my game, I call a method on my AudioManager to play a sound - this obtains the necessary
I'm new to Game programmming and SDL, and I have been following Lazyfoo's SDL tutorials. My question is related to time based motion and frame rate based motion, basically which is better or appropriate depending on situations?. Could you give me an example where each of these methods are used?. Another question I have is that, in lazyfoo's two Motion tutorials (FPS based and time based) The time based method showed a much smoother animation while the Frame rate based one was a little hiccupy, meaning you could clearly see the gap between the previous location of the dot and its current
to do that. The challenge is how to make the game activate the function efficiently. This is what I've thought of so far: The algorithm can calculate a lot of time steps in a short time, so I could... would simply have to follow predefined trajectories, no need for an algorithm. The timer object could take care of updating all the trajectories at the right times. Also, if you think there is a totally different and better way to do this, please let me know. Additional info: the game is in C++, and the graphics engine is Ogre3D. EDIT: changed the part about the trajectories of the non
is so dynamic however, it seems to be that trees aren't ideal either, since they would have to be completely rebuilt every frame. I must admit I never implemented a physics engine that required spatial partitioning, do I indeed need to rebuild the tree every frame (assuming that everything is constantly moving) or can I update the trees after integrating? Advice is much appreciated - to give some...I'm currently working a 3D space game with A LOT of dynamic objects that are all moving (there is pretty much no static environment). I have the collision detection and resolution working just fine
I'm creating a component-based game object system. Some tips: GameObject is simply a list of Components. There are GameSubsystems. For example, rendering, physics etc. Each GameSubsystem contains pointers to some of Components. GameSubsystem is a very powerful and flexible abstraction: it represents any slice (or aspect) of the game world. There is a need in a mechanism of registering... GameSubsystems) can implement registerComponent(Component*). pro. Components and GameSubystems know nothing about each other. con. In C++ it would look like ugly and slow typeid-switch
I'm looking into building a cross-platform opensource 2D RPG style game engine for ChaiScript. I want to be able to do all of the graphics with SVG and need joystick input. I also need the libraries I use to be opensource and compatible with the BSD license. I'm familiar with allegro, ClanLib, and SDL. As far as I can tell, none of these libraries have built in or obvious integration for SVG... not seem to have joystick input support, which would require that SDL or some other library also be used. So my question can be summed up as this: What is the best way to get SVG and joystick